Does this make a good impression?

(written by Lawrence Krubner, however indented passages are often quotes)

Here is a guy accused of illegal collusion, and he tries to defend himself in a blog post full of bad grammar, slang, fonts of different sizes and of multiple colors, lots of curse words, and on odd mix of defensiveness and defiance. There is nothing wrong with any of that, and I try to ignore the silly fonts and colors when I’m reading posts like that, but I am curious about what kind of thinking lead to the writing of that post. Is that really the best way to explain oneself, when one has been accused of something serious? For instance:

my fund 500 Startups is investing in 7 or 8 YC startups out of the recent batch, and they are some very smart young entrepreneurs with some great business opportunities. most of them will fail, but that won’t stop them from starting, or me from investing. and sure, the pre-money is definitely on the high side compared to rest of market / previous years. so be it. Mercedes Benz ain’t cheap either…. but that shit is SHINY. if you don’t like it, don’t buy it.

also:

in short: if it Bleeds, it Leads… and Fuck. That. Noise. about Fair & Balanced, right?

on the other hand — some folks really are trying to innovate in venture capital, support & invest in thousands of entrepreneurs, that employ millions of people, who create billions of dollars in value, for customers and shareholders around the world. we ain’t trying to kill the Man in the Arena, mike… we’re rooting for him (or her).

naah, screw that shit & lets get back to Collusion cuz that sells newspapers.