Smash Company Splash Image

December 25th, 2017

In Business

4 Comments

Retail is suffering because the middle classes have lost $1,355 trillion in income since 1970

(written by lawrence krubner, however indented passages are often quotes). You can contact lawrence at: lawrence@krubner.com

Nowadays, there are a lot of articles being written about the collapse of retail in the USA. Some people blame Amazon and online shopping, but that is only a trivial part of the problem.

$1,355,610,000,000 of consumer spending is missing from the demand side of USA spending, and that should be kept in mind whenever you read an article about retail going through hell. The big boom in retail in the mid-20th century was thanks a strong middle class. Conversely, the collapse of income of the middle quintiles of income must lead to a contraction of retail. Consider these charts:

Table H-2. Share of Aggregate Income Received by Each Fifth and Top 5 Percent of Households

https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-income-households.html

Percent of income for the 3 middle quintiles in 1970:

10.8

17.4

24.5

total: 52.7%

In 2016:

8.3

14.2

22.9

total: 45.4%

The difference: 7.3%

The GDP of the USA in 2016:

18.57 trillion

https://www.google.com/search?q=usa+gdp+2016&oq=usa+gdp+2016&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.5605j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

So if the middle classes still had the same share of national income as they had in 1970, they would have an additional $1,355,610,000,000 to spend or save.

Retail spending in the USA in 2016 was around $5 trillion:

https://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Retail-Sales-Near-5-Trillion-2016/1013368

Hold the spend/save ratio constant and we can say that retail spending would be 27% higher in 2016, if the middle quintiles still had the same percentage of national income as they had in 1970.

You can make some adjustments for the increased spending in the top quintile, but most of the income has gone to the top 1% and most of that goes to savings rather than spending.

Obviously, all of our current stories about retail would be different if the middle classes still had the same percentage of national income that they had in 1970.

And please, please, please note, Amazon only had $131 billion in sales during 2016. It’s impact is very small compared to that missing $1,355 trillion.

Source



Check out my book:





RECENT COMMENTS

January 11, 2018 8:51 am

From Karthik Raghunathan on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"the great kathy sierra has covered one aspect of this in one of her posts : http://headrush.typepad.com/creat..."

January 7, 2018 8:12 pm

From lawrence on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"A good article here: https://hbr.org/2014/03/why-good-managers-are-so-rare If great managers seem scarce..."

January 7, 2018 5:14 pm

From lawrence on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"I had another thought about this. I think many businesses tend to promote extroverts, on the assumption th..."

January 5, 2018 4:49 pm

From lawrence on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"Also worth reading is this article which reminds me how many terrible managers there are. If you run a large c..."

January 3, 2018 5:50 pm

From lawrence on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"Rodrigo Dias, thank you for writing. I should have emphasized the bit about the French going to dinner. I agre..."

January 3, 2018 4:52 am

From Rodrigo Dias on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"I agree with management through O3 (I've written about it here..."

January 1, 2018 12:14 pm

From Sergei on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"This is too much witch hunt. If you have a one on one just so you can figure out who to blame for a problem th..."

December 30, 2017 8:25 pm

From lawrence on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"Will Pemble, I agree. The key issue is delegation. To be productive at the personal level, we must learn to de..."

December 29, 2017 12:29 pm

From Will Pemble on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"Lawrence, Your recount of a marketing meeting is a great example of circular conversation. Busy people rarely..."

December 28, 2017 7:59 pm

From lawrence on Retail is suffering because the middle classes have lost $1,355 trillion in income since 1970

"I suppose we should round that to $1.356 trillion...."

December 28, 2017 7:15 pm

From Anonymous on Retail is suffering because the middle classes have lost $1,355 trillion in income since 1970

"Apparently, $1,355,610,000,000 = $1,355 trillion...."

December 28, 2017 12:51 pm

From lawrence on Business productivity has been undermined by the hubris and power-grabbing of elite computer programmers

""By Just A Programmer", thank you for writing. I think we agree that top level programmers should be focused o..."

December 28, 2017 12:39 pm

From Just A Programmer on Business productivity has been undermined by the hubris and power-grabbing of elite computer programmers

"I've observed exactly the opposite dysfunction at many companies. The programmers are used as general workers..."

December 28, 2017 11:00 am

From lawrence on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"Ian, thank you for writing. You ask "And who are you to educate them?" Presumably that is my job, if I have be..."

December 28, 2017 4:23 am

From Ian on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"And who are you to educate them? How do can you find yourself the power to decide if someone in your team is b..."

4 COMMENTS

Pingback: Retail is suffering because the middle classes have lost $1,355 trillion in income since 1970 via /r/economy | Chet Wang

December 28, 2017
7:15 pm

By Anonymous

Apparently, $1,355,610,000,000 = $1,355 trillion.

December 28, 2017
7:59 pm

By lawrence

I suppose we should round that to $1.356 trillion.

Pingback: Retail is suffering because the middle classes have lost $1,355 trillion in income since 1970 – Snapzu Business

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>