December 25th, 2017

# Retail is suffering because the middle classes have lost $1,355 trillion in income since 1970 (written by lawrence krubner, however indented passages are often quotes). You can contact lawrence at: lawrence@krubner.com Nowadays, there are a lot of articles being written about the collapse of retail in the USA. Some people blame Amazon and online shopping, but that is only a trivial part of the problem.$1,355,610,000,000 of consumer spending is missing from the demand side of USA spending, and that should be kept in mind whenever you read an article about retail going through hell. The big boom in retail in the mid-20th century was thanks a strong middle class. Conversely, the collapse of income of the middle quintiles of income must lead to a contraction of retail. Consider these charts:

Table H-2. Share of Aggregate Income Received by Each Fifth and Top 5 Percent of Households

https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/historical-income-households.html

Percent of income for the 3 middle quintiles in 1970:

10.8

17.4

24.5

total: 52.7%

In 2016:

8.3

14.2

22.9

total: 45.4%

The difference: 7.3%

The GDP of the USA in 2016:

18.57 trillion

So if the middle classes still had the same share of national income as they had in 1970, they would have an additional $1,355,610,000,000 to spend or save. Retail spending in the USA in 2016 was around$5 trillion:

https://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Retail-Sales-Near-5-Trillion-2016/1013368

Hold the spend/save ratio constant and we can say that retail spending would be 27% higher in 2016, if the middle quintiles still had the same percentage of national income as they had in 1970.

You can make some adjustments for the increased spending in the top quintile, but most of the income has gone to the top 1% and most of that goes to savings rather than spending.

Obviously, all of our current stories about retail would be different if the middle classes still had the same percentage of national income that they had in 1970.

And please, please, please note, Amazon only had $131 billion in sales during 2016. It’s impact is very small compared to that missing$1,355 trillion.

Source

Check out my book:

August 11, 2018 8:10 pm

"I should add, I feel that Python 1.x and 2.x added something to the world of technology. Early Python was both..."

August 11, 2018 10:44 am

"Ryan, about this: " the default should be to not try to install packages system-wide". Agreed. I think that is..."

August 10, 2018 8:23 pm

"I suspect your problem is that you missed the step in the instructions where it told you to run all those comm..."

August 5, 2018 4:41 pm

"This one is very intense reading thank you..."

July 27, 2018 12:04 am

"Many coed leagues require a certain %age of women players, like volleyball 2 out of 5, in a lot of leagues. ..."

July 15, 2018 3:17 pm

"Good to know that I wasn't too late :)..."

July 15, 2018 8:32 am

"Thank you for these comments regarding Anki. It sounds useful. I can imagine having the full context of the se..."

July 15, 2018 6:32 am

"Anki limits how much you review. I have 10000+ cards across my decks but the program arranges them in such a w..."

July 6, 2018 3:42 pm

"RK, your comment is irresponsible and pure FUD. These technologies are not being deprecated. Some of them have..."

July 5, 2018 10:21 am

"Deprecation warning: The Packer, Artifact Registry and Terraform Enterprise (Legacy) features of Atlas will no..."

June 25, 2018 11:58 am

"Solid read. I will say that it seems like there is a lot of momentum growing around Ansible these days. It see..."

June 21, 2018 11:25 pm

"Thank you for this. Sometimes I feel like I'm living in a bizarre, pro-Docker for everything world. I am prima..."

May 30, 2018 4:35 pm

"Thank you for this beautifully written and relevant piece. I think it has saved me a whole world of pain. ..."

May 29, 2018 10:46 am

"Andrew Reilly, thank you for writing. You make several good points, especially this: "Also an extra layer o..."

May 28, 2018 11:17 pm

"Nice article, thanks! I think that it's interesting to also look around at the problem from a greater dista..."

December 28, 2017
7:15 pm

By Anonymous

Apparently, $1,355,610,000,000 =$1,355 trillion.

December 28, 2017
7:59 pm

By lawrence

I suppose we should round that to \$1.356 trillion.