The future of journalism

(written by lawrence krubner, however indented passages are often quotes). You can contact lawrence at: lawrence@krubner.com, or follow me on Twitter.

So-called “objective journalism” was never actually objective, but for awhile it had advertising, and the advertisers didn’t want to upset anyone, so the need to appear objective was strong, for almost a century. As the advertising money fades away, the illusion of objectivity also fades away. Who can fund journalism now? That’s obvious: people with some agenda to advance. Partisan journalism is the future of journalism.

Paul Krugman is upset about something the National Review said:

For those new to this, Nate is a sports statistician turned political statistician, who has been maintaining a model that takes lots and lots of polling data — most of it at the state level, which is where the presidency gets decided — and converts it into election odds. Like others doing similar exercises — Drew Linzer, Sam Wang, and Pollster — Nate’s model continued to show an Obama edge even after Denver, and has shown that edge widening over the past couple of weeks.

This could be wrong, obviously. And we’ll find out on Election Day. But the methodology has been very clear, and all the election modelers have been faithful to their models, letting the numbers fall where they may.

Yet the right — and we’re not talking about the fringe here, we’re talking about mainstream commentators and publications — has been screaming “bias”! They know, just know, that Nate must be cooking the books. How do they know this? Well, his results look good for Obama, so it must be a cheat. Never mind the fact that Nate tells us all exactly how he does it, and that he hasn’t changed the formula at all.

Post external references

  1. 1
    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/28/the-war-on-objectivity/
Source