Smash Company Splash Image

March 23rd, 2011

In Philosophy

2 Comments

Coal is more deadly than nuclear power

(written by lawrence krubner, however indented passages are often quotes). You can contact lawrence at: lawrence@krubner.com

The eco-system of the Earth can not survive in anything like its current vibrant state, so long as there are 6 billion or more humans on the planet. People live in denial about this fact. People want to have children, and they do not want to face up to the consequences of having children. Like anyone running from an important truth, people get defensive, and they look for scapegoats. The last few weeks have given people a chance to vocalize their concerns about nuclear power. While there are many, many valid reasons to be concerned about nuclear power, very few people are forthright enough to say “I prefer to have the planet destroyed by coal, rather than nuclear power.” Because that is the choice we face. Every society depends on coal, so no society wants to face up to the destructive power of coal. But coal is destructive. It also lethal. Consider this chart:

Source



Check out my book:





RECENT COMMENTS

March 27, 2018 8:49 am

From lawrence on Why are women being pushed away from the tech industry?

"Chris, thank you for writing. In terms of the evidence, the case seems overwhelming. It is damning that the pe..."

March 26, 2018 6:57 pm

From chris on Why are women being pushed away from the tech industry?

"you haven't really established your thesis - that women are being pushed away from tech. the last time i looke..."

March 11, 2018 10:49 am

From lawrence on Why are women being pushed away from the tech industry?

"Hasen Judy, thank you for writing. About this: "the tech industry is hostile to women or society discourage..."

March 11, 2018 4:32 am

From Hasen Judy on Why are women being pushed away from the tech industry?

"Saying that 5% of women are awesome at technology is not really generous on your part. First we have to ask..."

March 5, 2018 12:21 am

From Soundararajan on Why I hate all articles about design patterns

"You should immediately read the book "The Expert Beginner". Possibly your hate for design pattern originate..."

February 27, 2018 6:43 pm

From Bruno Della Motta on Object Oriented Programming is an expensive disaster which must end

"Man! I simply love you! I've always thought with myself: "why the heck should someone want to use OOP in PHP!?..."

February 26, 2018 8:35 pm

From lawrence on Object Oriented Programming is an expensive disaster which must end

"Bubuche, thank you for writing. As to whether encapsulation is right or wrong, much depends on the definition...."

February 26, 2018 4:58 pm

From lawrence on AWS is inappropriate for small startups because its complexity demands a specialist

"Richard Remer, thanks for writing. I agree, it is often best to simply have a powerful server. I think the clo..."

February 26, 2018 1:52 pm

From Richard Remer on AWS is inappropriate for small startups because its complexity demands a specialist

"If the AWS way already works for you, then it's useful. But if the AWS way does not, it's like pulling teeth ..."

February 25, 2018 9:13 pm

From Bubuche on Object Oriented Programming is an expensive disaster which must end

"I find this article quite interesting. However, there was something itching me all along the reading. From t..."

February 5, 2018 2:53 pm

From Joaquin Tucholski on Richard Feynman believed in failing fast

"We are going to construct a physique of information which we can truly declare for ourselves and which we ar..."

January 29, 2018 12:09 am

From lawrence on Sarah Kessler attacks Steve Yegge over so-called privilege

"Josh Rehman, thank you for writing. What you write is interesting. Kessler is not explicit about what she ..."

January 27, 2018 8:23 pm

From Josh Rehman on Sarah Kessler attacks Steve Yegge over so-called privilege

"Kessler hints at her goal with this line in the last paragraph: "The blog post displays a lack of awareness fo..."

January 11, 2018 8:51 am

From Karthik Raghunathan on One-on-one meetings are underrated, whereas group meetings waste time

"the great kathy sierra has covered one aspect of this in one of her posts : http://headrush.typepad.com/creat..."

2 COMMENTS

March 25, 2011
2:03 pm

By Kelly Janes

This is very interesting, and I have some questions. How is the nuclear “death” rate determined? Are they only counting deaths that happen as a result of meltdowns and emergencies like the one they are currently experiencing in Japan? Do they track the radiation effects down family lines? If my two year old were exposed to radiation from a nuclear facility meltdown and became infertile as a result, would that show up in this chart?
On the other hand, I’m curious to know if the oil and coal deaths include only catastrophic events, or if they have devised a way to estimate all the deaths that occur as a result of our use of the fuels. Many questions!

March 25, 2011
3:14 pm

By lawrence

Kelly, those are good questions. The original article is here:

http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/deaths-per-twh-by-energy-source.html

As it says there:

“The air pollution data is mainly from the World Health Organization and the european study Externe. The World Health Organization compiled peer reviewed health studies on air pollution from many institutions. Occupational health and safety statistics track the deaths of workers in the different industries.”

My sense is that the WHO released a meta survey of other studies. Such studies always need to be taken with a grain of salt. In the end, we can never know for sure how many deaths are caused by any particular energy source. For that matter, we can never know how many people die due to the sun. We have only estimates and uncertainty, as we grope forward in the dark.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>