Smash Company Splash Image

August 26th, 2018

In Philosophy

2 Comments

What’s wrong with Hacker News

(written by lawrence krubner, however indented passages are often quotes). You can contact lawrence at: lawrence@krubner.com

I often post comments on Hacker News. Over the years I’ve become increasingly frustrated with how the community works. I’ve been thinking about why, and I think it comes down to this:

1.) I want to read the comments by highly experienced people, reflecting the wisdom gained over the years. I’ve been doing tech work for 20 years now, and I’m especially interested in comments from peers.

2.) the audience at Hacker News skews young, and the comments are given prominence based on their popularity.

My annoyance with Hacker News arises in situations like this:

a.) a topic comes up such as “What makes a great manager?”

b.) many of the commenters are in their 20s and post comments from the point of view of people being managed

c.) someone with 20 years experience says something that is true but unpopular, often something that is true but reflects the viewpoint of someone who has spent many years managing others.

d.) this comment is unpopular so it gets downvoted

To me, this is a reminder why the blogosphere of 2000-2008 was so much better than any currently existing forum. I knew who each blogger was, I could give them prominence based on how well I knew them. If Sam Ruby said something unpopular, I gave it a careful listen, because I knew he choose his words carefully.

And this leads to another problem on Hacker News:

Without any easy way to follow individual commenters, I don’t follow commenters. Sometimes someone says something that I strongly disagree with. Should I give them a listen any way, as I would if it was Sam Ruby writing? I’ve got no incentive to do so, since I can’t trust everyone, and the commenter has no reputation with me.

What I really want is something like the old blogosphere, with an easier way to reply to someone from my own blog. This is what Technorati should have done in 2006, and instead Technorati just gave up and died. People have been using Twitter instead, but Twitter comes with its own set of problems.

Source



Check out my book:





RECENT COMMENTS

January 18, 2019 10:22 am

From Justin McGuire on When will the era of CyberPunk end?

"The reason cyberpunk doesn't die is because it all came true. From Noah Smith on twitter: "The cool thing a..."

December 16, 2018 9:06 am

From lawrence on Yair Lapid: What does it say about us that Israel has become the only democracy in the world in which Jews don’t have freedom of religion?

"Cat Mara, thank you for catching that. I've fixed it now. (The URL was a "v" by mistake. Looks like I was tryi..."

December 12, 2018 7:50 pm

From lawrence on Object Oriented Programming is an expensive disaster which must end

"Jussi Nurminen, thank you for writing. I believe you are correct, in the sense that Python 2.x had all the bas..."

December 12, 2018 5:13 am

From Jussi Nurminen on Object Oriented Programming is an expensive disaster which must end

"Hello! I've lately became a bit more suspicious of OO designs (including my own), so I read your original 2014..."

December 4, 2018 9:22 am

From lawrence on Docker is the dangerous gamble which we will regret

"GK, thank you for writing, but I don't understand what you mean when you write: "However, at that point you..."

December 4, 2018 7:14 am

From GK on Docker is the dangerous gamble which we will regret

"A development VM is a fine choice, provided that it comes with tools that make it just as easy to run commands..."

November 30, 2018 7:04 pm

From lawrence on Docker is the dangerous gamble which we will regret

"GK, thank you for writing. About this part: "That thing is writing portable shell scripts. The moment you n..."

November 30, 2018 1:41 pm

From GK on Docker is the dangerous gamble which we will regret

"The fat binaries article was nice, but full blown fat binaries are not really necessary. Whats needed is that ..."

November 27, 2018 1:13 am

From lawrence on Object Oriented Programming is an expensive disaster which must end

"Andres Moreno, thank you for writing. Among other points to be said, I'll say I'm almost heart broken about Py..."

November 26, 2018 9:11 pm

From Andres Moreno on Object Oriented Programming is an expensive disaster which must end

"I am stunned! Why did it take so long to show that the Emperor has no clothes? I got bit by the Lisp bug early..."

November 23, 2018 8:24 am

From Just An Observer on Hillary Clinton keeps making the same mistakes

"Similar to the "Let's dump Nancy Pelosi, since the Republicans don't like her" talk we hear all the time...."

November 22, 2018 11:49 pm

From Free Speech Message Board on Zed Shaw is angry (abstraction and indirection)

"Americans used to think hippies were lazy fruits for dropping out during the Vietnam War, but maybe the hippie..."

November 19, 2018 5:13 pm

From Justin McGuire on To start with, tran­sient query surges are no longer a prob­lem?

"I think the idea is that a surge in traffic results in more messages on the queue, which can be handled at a n..."

November 19, 2018 12:45 pm

From J on Docker is the dangerous gamble which we will regret

"What are everyone's recommendations for fat binary bare metal deployments preferably with hooks into continuou..."

2 COMMENTS

August 27, 2018
1:04 pm

By Dave Paola

I agree completely, although HN does support RSS feeds for user comments. I use this to follow people I respect.

November 19, 2018
10:19 am

By Gábor Hidvégi

I think the problem is broader: web 2.0 failed.

One part of Web 2.0 was about “user content”, everyone is couraged to start their own blog, share his thoughts everywhere (forum, website content) etc.

What happened? Most people started trolling, flooding channels, so relevant pieces of information sink. Experienced people get downvoted from inexperienced people everywhere.

Besides this there is plethora of content with no value and it grows thanks to these people with no knowledge, intelligence and original thoughts.

We live in the age of “eat excrementum, 2 billion flies cannot be wrong”.

And besides that Web 2.0 failed in the technical way as well, because it cannot handle the size of this content. One cannot get the pieces of information he’s interested in faster than a decade or two decades ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>