January 1st, 2016
(written by lawrence krubner, however indented passages are often quotes). You can contact lawrence at: email@example.com
It’s interesting to read those who were on the losing side of history, fighting against Functional Programming:
If you’re writing 2000-line classes and 500-line methods then you’re in no way qualified to be speaking about object-oriented programming, let alone comparing it with the latest FAD ideology.
Christian Toivola gave what has become the standard answer:
@Mark Lee Smith: With the amount of functional concepts seeping into OO languages like Java and C# you ought to be ashamed of ignorant comments like that. And in fairness, its possible to write monolithic code regardless of your choice of programming paradigm. Besides a somewhat bad example which you are now nitpicking, what he says is correct: when you get simpler data structures, it becomes easier to break away from sub-type polymorphism which is problematic to say the least. If you don’t recognize that, then perhaps you have not spent enough time doing OOP. If I have to use another convoluted design pattern to do something that is supposed to be /simple/ then I will blow my brains out. I am so sick of this C++ heritage that it makes me want to puke – it has truly reached the height of its usefulness and its plain to see that modern languages are shifting away from this crippling ideology. K THX BYE.